The implementation of Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) can vary depending on the organization's structure, size, and needs. Below are the different types of SRE team implementations:
Here is the information in a table format:
SRE Team Model | Description | Responsibilities | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|
Standalone SRE Team | A dedicated SRE team works independently from other teams. | Own reliability, manage incidents, monitoring, and system improvements. | Centralized expertise, clear role separation. | Risk of silos, limited collaboration with development teams. |
Embedded SRE Team | SREs are embedded in development teams and work closely with them. | Integrate reliability into development, support developers in adopting SRE practices. | Strong collaboration, reliability integrated into development lifecycle. | Resource-intensive, inconsistent practices across teams. |
Consulting SRE Team | SRE team acts as consultants, advising on reliability best practices. | Provide guidance, tools, and training for teams to improve reliability. | Promotes reliability across teams, scales well in large organizations. | Limited accountability for actual reliability, reliance on other teams. |
Shared SRE Team | A single SRE team supports multiple product teams by providing shared services and expertise. | Build and maintain tools for monitoring, alerting, deployment, and reliability standards across teams. | Economical use of resources, standardized practices. | Teams compete for SRE resources, limited team-specific knowledge. |
Functional/Platform SRE | Focused on the reliability of shared platforms or infrastructure. | Manage core infrastructure, CI/CD pipelines, and shared platforms. | High reliability of core systems, product teams focus on features. | Limited involvement in product-specific reliability issues. |
Hybrid Model | Combines multiple SRE models, adapting to diverse organizational needs. | Balance collaboration and standardization, embed SREs in critical teams while maintaining centralized teams. | Highly adaptable and scalable. | Complex to implement and manage. |